Authors: D. Tapes, V. Skampardonis, M. K. Chatzis, K. Apostolidis, L. V. Athanasiou, D. Kasabalis, K. C. G. Kokkinaki, E. G. Katsogiannou, T. Petanides, L. Leontides and M. N. Saridomichelakis
|
||||||
Résumé, analyse et commentaires |
||||||
Aucun.
|
||||||
Photo |
||||||
Aucune.
|
||||||
Analysis |
||||||
None.
|
||||||
Abstract |
Source |
|
|
|||
BACKGROUND: The optimal microscopic magnification and number of optical fields of adhesive tape strip cytological slides that should be examined when searching for Malassezia yeasts on canine skin are unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine the optimal magnification and the minimum number of optical fields that should be examined to maximise intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven experienced examiners counted, twice, the number of yeasts in 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 optical fields of 40 slides at ×400 and ×1000 magnification. RESULTS: The number of yeasts per unit surface area was significantly higher at ×1000 compared to ×400 magnification. Repeatability and reproducibility for counting the yeasts was very poor. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Adhesive tape strip cytological slides should be examined microscopically for Malassezia spp. at ×1000 magnification. The repeatability of this examination for counting the yeasts is poor.
|